CoverageIndiana

PreparedStatewide 911 fee · Indiana Statewide 911 Board

Indiana 911 surcharge remittance

We prepare a filing packet for Provider Remittance Form, filed in the Indiana Statewide 911 Board Remittance Service. You key it into the portal and certify it there.

The state accepts no document for this filing: the return is keyed into the agency’s portal. What follows is the computed figure set, for you to enter.

Indiana publishes no downloadable return. The Board first prescribed a “Provider Remittance Form” in 2012 and then authorized its own executive director to convert it to electronic form, and what exists today is a login-gated remittance service with a separate payment portal beside it. There is no document to fill and no revision to pin. What the product produces is the computed fee with the facility counts, the excluded and exempt lines, and the provenance behind them, which the provider keys into the remittance service and submits themselves.

The rate in force now

Rate
$1.00 per line per month · Statewide 911 fee
Effective
2015-07-01 → current
Cite
IC 36-8-16.7-32(a)
Form rev.
the state publishes no revision label
Retrieved
Thu, September 3, 2026 · two independent fetches agree

Cadence

assigned by the agency
“Subject to subsection (c), a provider shall remit statewide 911 fees collected under this section to the board at the time and in the manner prescribed by the board. However, the board shall require a provider to report to the board, no less frequently than on an annual basis, the amount of fees collected from all of the provider’s customers described in subsection (a)(1) and remitted to the board under this section.”
IC 36-8-16.7-33(b)

The fee itself is billed monthly and may not be prorated — IC 36-8-16.7-33(a) works it into the provider’s normal monthly billing process — but the statute fixes no remittance cadence and delegates it to the Board, which prescribes it per account inside the remittance service. The three cadences are offered here because the statute’s only published floor is an annual report; which one applies is what the Board told the provider, and the provider sets it from their own account.

A provider who does not know their prescribed cadence should ask the Board before filing rather than infer one from this record.

Due dates

Indiana publishes no remittance due date. IC 36-8-16.7-33(b) delegates the time and the manner to the Board, the Board prescribes both inside its login-gated remittance service, and three independent research passes plus the adjudicator searched the Board’s public site, its resolutions including Resolution 2013-3, and both portals without finding one. This record therefore holds no Indiana date, and the calendar shows the absence rather than a date nobody published.

The provider’s own account in the Board’s remittance service is where the prescribed date lives. Read it there, and ask the Board in writing if it is not shown.

Authority conflict

2 disagreements between the state's own documents.

This is never settled in code. Both positions are reproduced as the state wrote them, the engine’s posture is stated plainly, and the period is flagged for review so a person decides before it closes.

What the one dollar multiplies — the exchange access facility, or the customer account

Flagged for review

Indiana’s statute and the collecting agency’s own provider page both put the fee on the facility: the fee-liable standard user is defined as an exchange access facility for a nonmobile user, and the Board’s remittance page says “$1.00 per device”. A different Indiana state document describes it the other way. The State Board of Accounts’ review of the Statewide 911 Board’s own audited financial statements says in a footnote that providers bill “each customer/user … one dollar ($1.00) per month” for all communications services the customer uses. That is narrative summary in an audit note rather than an operative statement of the counting unit, and this record ships the statute’s reading — but it is a state text saying something different about the entire Indiana multiplier, so it is displayed rather than suppressed.

IC 36-8-16.7-21 with IC 36-8-16.7-32(a), from the Board’s own published chapter compilation

““standard user” or “user” refers to: (1) a communications service user who pays retrospectively for the service and has an Indiana billing address for the service; and (2) in the case of a nonmobile communications service user, an exchange access facility used in Indiana. … The amount of the fee assessed under this subsection is one dollar ($1).”

https://www.in911.net/uploads/1/2/4/9/124957688/ic_36-8-16.7_statewide_911_services.pdf

Indiana State Board of Accounts — review of the Statewide 911 Board’s audited financial statements, Note 1

“are required to charge each customer/user a monthly fee for 911 services… the fee for all communication services used by the customer/user are billed one dollar ($1.00) per month.”

https://audit.sboa.in.gov/WebReports/34190A.pdf

What the engine does: The engine multiplies by the facility count, following the statute’s own definition of the fee-liable standard user and the Board’s own provider-facing page, and it shows the facility count, the rate and the arithmetic on every Indiana figure. It does not compute the audit footnote’s per-account reading and does not present either text as settled.

What you can do: Ask the Indiana Statewide 911 Board (support@in911.net, 317.234.8362) in writing to confirm that the fee is assessed per exchange access facility rather than per customer account, and record the answer with its date and the name of the person who gave it. Ask for the prescribed remittance cadence and due date in the same message.

The current text of the Board’s one-time fee-increase window

Flagged for review

The Board’s own published compilation of the chapter is stamped “Indiana Code 2021” and states the Board’s one-time increase authority as running after April 1, 2020 and before July 1, 2023. A 2026 search result reports the same clause reading after April 30, 2023 and before July 1, 2026, which would mean a later amendment the Board’s compilation does not carry. The current codified text could not be read: the General Assembly’s site serves only an application shell to every automated client, its interface returns an authorization error without a registered key, and its archive returns the same. A search result is not a state publication and is not carried here as a value. Nothing about the amount in force turns on this — the Board publishes one dollar today — but whether an increase window is open does.

IC 36-8-16.7-32(a)(1)(A), from the Statewide 911 Board’s own chapter compilation, footer “Indiana Code 2021”

“The board may increase the fee only one (1) time after April 1, 2020, and before July 1, 2023, in an amount not to exceed ten cents ($0.10).”

https://www.in911.net/uploads/1/2/4/9/124957688/ic_36-8-16.7_statewide_911_services.pdf

A 2026 search-engine result reporting the same clause, recorded as unverified and never as a value

“after April 30, 2023, and before July 1, 2026”

What the engine does: Nothing in the arithmetic depends on this clause, so the engine prices Indiana at the published one dollar and attaches no flag to a filing on account of it. The conflict is carried on the record and displayed on the state’s page so that a reader knows the increase window’s current text was never read from the codified source.

What you can do: Open IC 36-8-16.7-32 at the General Assembly’s site in a browser, record the current text of subsection (a)(1)(A) with its retrieval date, and read the Statewide 911 Board’s 2026 meeting minutes to confirm whether an increase was adopted.

Counting rule

Per exchange access facility, not per customer account. IC 36-8-16.7-32(a) assesses the fee on each standard user, and IC 36-8-16.7-21(2) defines a standard user, for a nonmobile communications service user, as an exchange access facility used in Indiana — so a customer with twenty facilities is twenty standard users at one dollar each. An exchange access facility is the access from a service user’s premises to a telephone system, and regardless of technology it includes an access line, a private branch exchange trunk and a centrex line trunk equivalent.

The chapter reaches interconnected voice over internet protocol by its own terms — IC 36-8-16.7-23 defines a VoIP provider as one offering interconnected VoIP service to users in Indiana — and it counts VoIP the same way it counts everything else, by the facility. What the chapter contains no rule for is trunk or concurrent-call equivalency: no statute, Board rule or Board publication addresses how a SIP trunk provisioned for several simultaneous calls maps onto a facility, and the adjudicator’s read of the full chapter agrees that none exists. The unit’s own exclusions carry more weight in Indiana than in most states, which is why this state’s entry grid asks for them: IC 36-8-16.7-10(c) removes a provider-owned pay station line, a wide area telecommunications service line, a foreign exchange line, an incoming-only line and broadband internet access service from the definition entirely.

Per-customer cap
None. No per-customer or per-location cap appears anywhere in IC 36-8-16.7, on the reading of all three research passes and the adjudicator’s own read of the full chapter. Recorded as an absence found in the chapter rather than as a confirmation that the Board has no practice of its own, which would live behind the portal.

“Sec. 21. As used in this chapter, “standard user” or “user” refers to: (1) a communications service user who pays retrospectively for the service and has an Indiana billing address for the service; and (2) in the case of a nonmobile communications service user, an exchange access facility used in Indiana.”
IC 36-8-16.7-21
“Sec. 10. (a) As used in this chapter, “exchange access facility” means the access from a particular service user’s premises to a telephone system. (b) Regardless of technology, the term includes: (1) an access line; (2) a private branch exchange (PBX) trunk; and (3) a centrex line trunk equivalent; that is provided by the service supplier. The term also includes a mobile telephone system access trunk, whether the trunk is provided by a telephone company or a radio common carrier. (c) The term does not include: (1) a service supplier owned and operated telephone pay station line; (2) a wide area telecommunications service (WATS) line; (3) a foreign exchange (FX) line; (4) an incoming only line; or (5) the provision of broadband Internet access service.”
IC 36-8-16.7-10
“the board shall assess a monthly statewide 911 fee on each standard user that is a customer having a place of primary use in Indiana at a rate that ensures full recovery of the amount needed for the board to make distributions to county treasurers consistent with this chapter and that provides for the proper development, operation, and maintenance of a statewide 911 system. The amount of the fee assessed under this subsection is one dollar ($1).”
IC 36-8-16.7-32(a)
“A provider may not prorate the monthly 911 fee collected from a user.”
IC 36-8-16.7-33(a)

Collection allowance

1.00%
Applies to
the gross amount collected
On the form
Not published. The remittance form is a screen inside the Board’s service and its field set could not be seen, so where the deduction is entered is unknown; the statute states it as an amount the provider deducts and retains.
“A provider, including an eligible telecommunications carrier under section 32(f) of this chapter, may deduct and retain an amount not to exceed one percent (1%) of fees that the provider collects from users under this section or section 32 of this chapter, to reimburse the direct costs incurred by the provider in collecting and remitting the fees.”
IC 36-8-16.7-33(c)

One percent is a ceiling rather than a fixed allowance: the statute grants an amount “not to exceed” it, tied to the direct costs the provider actually incurs in collecting and remitting. The provider enters the direct costs they are deducting for the period, and the product checks the figure against the one percent. With nothing entered, nothing is deducted, and a flag shows the most the statute allows.

Rate history

1 window on record

The engine resolves the window that covers the filing period, never the latest one. A back period therefore prices at the rate that was in force for it.

  • 2015-07-01 → current

    $1.00 per line per month · Statewide 911 fee

    IC 36-8-16.7-32(a)

    https://www.in911.net/remit-fees.html · retrieved Thu, September 3, 2026

    The effective date comes from the collecting agency’s own words: “Effective, July 1, 2015, all communication service providers in Indiana who provide wireless, landline, lifeline, and VoIP services must collect a monthly statewide 911 fee of $1.00 per device.”

    No predecessor amount was located by any research pass, so no earlier window is recorded and an Indiana period beginning before July 1, 2015 is refused rather than priced.

    The Board’s chapter compilation carries a footer stamp of “Indiana Code 2021”. The definitional sections behind the counting unit both read “As added by P.L.132-2012, SEC.20” with no later amendment in that compilation, and the Board’s live page still publishes one dollar — but the current codified text of the Board’s own fee-increase window could not be read, because the General Assembly’s site serves only an application shell to every automated client. That is carried as a conflict on this record.

    Flagged for review: What the one dollar multiplies — the exchange access facility, or the customer account

Zero-report rule

not published

Zero report · not on record

Whether a month with no collected fees still requires a filed remittance is unknown. The only reporting duty in the chapter is IC 36-8-16.7-33(b)’s at-least-annual report of amounts collected and remitted, which on its face admits a zero figure without saying that a zero period must be filed, and no research pass could see whether the remittance service itself requires a submission each cycle. Indiana publishes no sworn or signed zero-report declaration anywhere in IC 36-8-16.7, and this product composes none.

Searched: IC 36-8-16.7 in full from the Board’s own published chapter compilation, the Board’s remittance and resolutions pages, Board Resolution 2013-3, and both portals’ public entry points. All three research passes reached the absence.

Record retention

not published

Record retention · not on record

Indiana publishes no provider-side record-retention period for this fee. IC 36-8-16.7 imposes no duration, and no Board rule or resolution supplies one. A provider should keep the period’s counts and its remittance record for as long as their own auditors and any other applicable rule require, and ask the Board what it expects.

Searched: IC 36-8-16.7 in full from the Board’s own chapter compilation, and the Board’s published resolutions and guidance. All three research passes reached the absence.

Registration

There is no self-service registration. Credentials for the Board’s remittance service are created by the Board, and a provider gets them by contacting the Board directly.

https://www.in911.net/remit-fees.html

The Board’s own instruction on its remittance page is to contact its staff for a login to be created or a password reset. No application form and no online sign-up path was found by any research pass, which is a fact about Indiana’s process rather than a missing piece of this record.

The agency’s portal

Return
Provider Remittance Form, filed in the Indiana Statewide 911 Board Remittance Service
Form
The state publishes no form identifier. Indiana assigns no numbered form identifier. The Board’s own name for the artifact is the “Provider Remittance Form”, first prescribed on August 30, 2012 and converted to electronic form under Board Resolution 2013-3, and no revision marker is published for it. Drift detection for Indiana therefore watches the remittance service itself rather than a form revision.

The provider signs in to the Board’s remittance service with an account number and password the Board issues, enters the period’s figures, and pays either there or through the Board’s separate payment portal. There is no downloadable form, no mail-in path published anywhere this record reached, and no submission this product performs.

Remit to

State, single agency
Agency
Indiana Statewide 911 Board
Division
A separate body corporate and politic, administratively associated with the Office of the Indiana Treasurer of State
Payee
Indiana Statewide 911 Board
Address
Remitted inside the Board’s own remittance service, with payment through the Board’s payment portal. There is no mailing address for the return.
Contact
support@in911.net · 317.234.8362 · 10 W. Market St., Suite 2420, Indianapolis, IN 46204
Rate set by
The General Assembly set the amount at one dollar by statute. IC 36-8-16.7-32(a)(1) lets the Board adjust it within stated limits, and the Board publishes any change on its own site.

Out of scope

What this page does not cover.

  • The enhanced prepaid wireless charge, IC 36-8-16.6

    It is one dollar per retail transaction, collected by the retail seller and remitted through the Department of Revenue — a different remitter, a different chapter and a different return. It carries the same dollar amount as this fee, which is exactly why it is named here: IC 36-8-16.7-32(c) says outright that it is not an additional fee for the purposes of this section.

  • The eligible telecommunications carrier Lifeline payment, IC 36-8-16.7-32(e)–(f)

    A carrier that receives federal universal-service Lifeline reimbursement pays the Board a second monthly amount computed from the same one dollar and its own reimbursed end-user count. It is a parallel obligation of that carrier, not part of this remittance, and this product neither computes nor prepares it.

  • Local 911 fees

    IC 36-8-16.7-32(c) bars a state agency or a local unit of government from levying an additional 911 fee, so there is no Indiana local component for a provider to remit. Named because a provider filing in several states will look for one.

  • Companion 988, relay and poison-control charges

    No research pass identified a 988, telecommunications relay or poison-control obligation riding this fee. Nothing could be confirmed about the remittance service’s own fields, so this is an absence in Indiana’s published materials rather than a look inside the portal.

Everything else this record does not know

Due dates · not on record

Indiana has no published remittance due date. IC 36-8-16.7-33(b) hands the time and the manner to the Board, and the Board prescribes both inside its login-gated remittance service. No date from any public source exists to put in the calendar, so this record holds none and the absence is shown wherever an Indiana date would otherwise appear.

Searched: IC 36-8-16.7 in full, the Board’s remittance, resolutions and meetings pages, Board Resolution 2013-3 read in full, and both portals’ public entry points, by three research passes and the adjudicator.

Cadence · not on record

The remittance cadence is prescribed per account by the Board and is not published either. The statute’s only published floor is a report at least annually, so this record offers the three cadences the product supports and asks the provider for the one the Board gave them rather than deriving a cadence Indiana never stated.

Searched: IC 36-8-16.7-33 in full, Board Resolution 2013-3, and the Board’s published pages, by three research passes.

Filing method · not on record

The remittance service’s own field set was never seen, because it is behind a login the Board issues by hand. Whether the form asks for facilities, accounts, collected amounts or all three, and whether it requires a submission in a period with nothing collected, are all unknown, so the Indiana packet lists the computed figures and their inputs rather than claiming a field order it could not verify.

Searched: Both portals’ public entry points and the Board’s published resolutions, by three research passes.

Rate history · not on record

No amount before July 1, 2015 was located by any research pass, so no earlier window is recorded and an Indiana period beginning before that date is refused rather than priced. Whether the Board ever exercised its one-time increase authority is also unconfirmed: the most recent audit evidence stops at June 30, 2025 and the 2026 Board minutes were never read, so “no evidence of a change” has not been turned into “confirmed no change”.

Searched: The Board’s chapter compilation, its remittance page, its meetings index, and the State Board of Accounts’ published review of the Board’s financial statements, by three research passes and the adjudicator.

Counting rule · not on record

No trunk, private branch exchange capacity or concurrent-call equivalency is defined anywhere in the chapter. A SIP trunk provisioned for several simultaneous calls is an access facility, and how many facilities it represents is not something Indiana publishes. A Board practice on the point would live inside the remittance service, which no research pass could see.

Searched: IC 36-8-16.7 in full from the Board’s own compilation, and the Board’s published pages, by three research passes and the adjudicator.

Sources

Every fact above traces to one of these, retrieved Thu, September 3, 2026.

The record was reached by independent research passes whose disagreement a third pass and an adjudication settled. Each source below opens at the address it was read from, with the date it was read.

Indiana Statewide 911 Board — its own published compilation of IC 36-8-16.7

The one dollar amount at §32(a), the standard-user definition at §21, the exchange access facility definition and its exclusions at §10, the VoIP provider definition at §23, the remittance and one percent provisions at §33, the liability rule at §34, the exempt users at §32(d), and the fee-increase window at §32(a)(1)(A) as that compilation carries it.

Retrieved Thu, September 3, 2026

Indiana Statewide 911 Board — “Remit 911 Fees”

The collecting agency’s own statement of the amount and its July 1, 2015 effective date, both portal addresses, and the instruction to contact Board staff for a login to be created.

Retrieved Thu, September 3, 2026

Indiana Statewide 911 Board — remittance service

That the remittance surface is a login-gated service taking an account number and a password, with no downloadable return behind it.

Retrieved Thu, September 3, 2026

Indiana Statewide 911 Board — payment portal

The separate payment channel the Board publishes beside its remittance service.

Retrieved Thu, September 3, 2026

Indiana State Board of Accounts — review of the Statewide 911 Board’s audited financial statements

The audit footnote describing the fee per customer rather than per facility, carried on this record as the divergent state text behind its counting-unit conflict.

Retrieved Wed, August 12, 2026

IC 36-8-16.7-10
The definition of an exchange access facility and the lines it excludes
IC 36-8-16.7-21
The definition of a standard user — the facility itself, for a nonmobile user
IC 36-8-16.7-23
The definition of a VoIP provider, which brings interconnected VoIP inside the chapter
IC 36-8-16.7-32
The monthly statewide 911 fee, its one dollar amount, the Board’s adjustment authority, and the exempt users
IC 36-8-16.7-33
The duty to collect and remit, the no-proration rule, the partial-payment rule, the report to the Board, and the one percent cost reimbursement
IC 36-8-16.7-34
The provider’s liability to remit the fees it collects — the reason this record’s priced count is a collected count
IC 36-8-16.7-38
Distributions to county treasurers, which happen after remittance
IC 36-8-16.6
The enhanced prepaid wireless charge, collected at retail point of sale and out of scope here

Notes carried on this record

The unit is the facility and the exclusions are part of the unit. A provider who enters a bare line count will include pay station, wide area telecommunications service, foreign exchange and incoming-only lines that Indiana’s own definition puts outside the fee, which is why this state’s grid asks for those separately and shows them beside the priced count.

The fee may not be prorated. A facility added or disconnected mid-month is a whole month’s fee, by IC 36-8-16.7-33(a), so an Indiana count is not a daily average.

Indiana’s remittance basis is fees collected rather than fees billed, and a partial payment goes against the provider’s own charges before the fee. That is why the priced field asks what was collected and the billed-but-uncollected figure is carried beside it.

The Board issues logins by hand and prescribes each account’s cadence and due date inside the service. A provider new to Indiana has one message to send — for credentials, for the cadence, and for the date — and this record’s registration steps say so.